Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	89.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '17 at 17:55
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9370-$194 9,054 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.8 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 81.4 2-Core 159 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 509 48% 400 Pts	64-Core 513 32% 513 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6173) CLim: 2138 MHz, MLim: 2177 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 121 Parallax 113 91% 115 fps	MRender 107 Gravity 105 Splatting 111 88% 108 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218 17,938 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 33265 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 680 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 0 0 3017 (AE) Unknown 100 100 314 (B5) Unknown 100 100 9848415454630 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 84 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 24421 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 1 1 100 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	49.5% Average	Read 263 Write 233 Mixed 250 56% 249 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 64.7 4K Mixed 4.67 71% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 5.72 34% 77 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 74%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 233GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 221 183 3950 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3177 (05) Reallocated sector count 190 190 77 (07) Seek error rate 200 188 0 (09) Power-on hours count 68 68 23539 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2505 (BE) vendor-specific 59 42 41 (C2) HDA temperature 109 92 41 (C4) Reallocation count 189 189 11 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 194 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 19 (C8) Write error rate 200 194 0	32.6% Below average	Read 61.4 Write 51.7 Mixed 58.3 43% 57.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.48 113% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 35%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 250GB-$44 9,759 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 233GB free Firmware: GM2OA5BA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 132 132 142 (03) Spinup time 126 126 12894470323 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5995 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 134 134 28 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 20240 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4039 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6332 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6332 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 231929151521 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	49.1% Average	Read 83.7 Write 87.2 Mixed 87.5 65% 86.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 98% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 50%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 38GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 147 140 3625 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5138 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 20464 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5099 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1215 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3922 (C2) HDA temperature 108 90 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.3% Above average	Read 103 Write 96.6 Mixed 106 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.44 102% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB 2,501 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.3% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 13.3 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 12.6 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	564x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	138x
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	80x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	67x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	62x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	59x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	41x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	40x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	33x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16