Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 23 '17 at 19:02
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 77.9
2-Core 156
66% 108 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 468
48% 389 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1375 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.8.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Lighting 63.4
Reflection 70
Parallax 79
52% 70.8 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 61.6
Splatting 58.9
52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 60GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 448
Write 78.5
Mixed 119
46% 215 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 15
79% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 71.7
DQ Write 73.8
DQ Mixed 29.7
34% 58.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1TB free, PID 2321
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 90
Write 94.7
Mixed 94.5
121% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.37
61% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38%
Great: 49%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
890GB free, PID 2321
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 81.2
Write 90.3
Mixed 74.3
106% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.33
69% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.3% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 16.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 13
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback