HP Pavilion TS 11 Notebook PC

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	HP Pavilion TS 11 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2178
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130920
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 23 '17 at 11:03
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-1250 APU 724 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Memory 46.1 1-Core 15.1 2-Core 27.8 22% 29.7 Pts	4-Core 26.9 8-Core 28.2 4% 27.5 Pts	64-Core 28.6 2% 28.6 Pts
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 26%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8210 4,832 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2178) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.15% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 2.54 Parallax 1.31 1% 1.67 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 2.35 2% 1.82 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.15% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226 35,454 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 611GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 175 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 135 (A5) Unknown 100 100 3342374 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 35 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 910 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 7 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 74 (C2) HDA temperature 66 70 300649021474 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 42949672970 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 490 (EA) Unknown 100 100 806 (F1) Unknown 253 253 764 (F2) Unknown 253 253 710 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	46.6% Average	Read 372 Write 228 Mixed 208 59% 269 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 19.3 4K Mixed 10.8 55% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 45.3 DQ Write 29.2 DQ Mixed 15.2 17% 29.9 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 107%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB 3,370 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 21GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 137 Write 107 Mixed 89.8 136% 111 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.84 80% 1.85 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 117%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.5% Very poor	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 4.3 10% 3.63 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 0.9 4% 1.3 GB/s	Latency 176 23% 176 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Pavilion TS 11 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 20%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion TS 11 Notebook PC

CPU
A4-1250 APUAMDBench 17%, 724 samples	15x
A6-1450 APUAMDBench 22%, 558 samples	2x

GPU
HD 8210AMDBench 1%, 4,832 samples	15x
HD 8250AMDBench 1%, 1,387 samples	2x

SSD
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	1x
120GB SSD 120GB3Bench 60%, 3,381 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 26%, 3,180 samples	4x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 25%, 14,353 samples	2x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $190

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16