HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	5.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120620
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '17 at 15:25
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	68% Good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 82 2-Core 164 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 271 8-Core 281 37% 276 Pts	64-Core 324 20% 324 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 300 2,463 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 0862) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 311.66 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.18% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 2.35 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.32 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 0.57 Splatting 1.7 2% 2.06 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.18% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 512GB-$74 4,600 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2842 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1110 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 59 (AE) Unknown 100 100 63 (B5) Unknown 100 100 79933882120717 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 190 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	61.6% Good	Read 505 Write 255 Mixed 339 81% 366 MB/s	4K Read 17.8 4K Write 56 4K Mixed 11.7 72% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 10.4 36% 78.3 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 81%
Volume0 500GB 366 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 376GB free Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	51% Above average	Read 65.6 Write 112 Mixed 74.5 63% 84 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.54 104% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 104%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB 8,748 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 57GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 26.2 Write 9.3 Mixed 20.4 22% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.37 4K Write 1.13 4K Mixed 0.83 79% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 16.1 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 14.9 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	684x
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	592x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	315x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	137x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16