Asrock Z77 Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '17 at 22:34
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 94.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 228
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 453
58% 441 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 282B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 38.1
26% 33.8 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 35
Splatting 34.9
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial_CT525MX3 525GB
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.8% Good
Read 261
Write 234
Mixed 260
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 60.8
4K Mixed 28.5
107% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 63
81% 146 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 169
Mixed 160
126% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 2.88
4K Mixed 0.31
127% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 98%
Great: 97%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
485GB free
Firmware: 1D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 93.8
Write 108
Mixed 117
81% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.46
123% 1.19 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
343GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 151
Mixed 149
124% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.27
4K Mixed 0.24
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
53GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 191
Write 102
Mixed 119
103% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 4.44
4K Mixed 0.26
141% 1.81 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
2GB free
Firmware: AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 107
Write 83.7
Mixed 72.8
66% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.18
77% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609ES2LX0. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 19.6
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 58.3
69% 58.3 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme6 - $236

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $720
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback