Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	Gigabyte Z87X-UD5H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140117
Uptime	15.9 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '17 at 19:39
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.2% Outstanding	Memory 94.9 1-Core 130 2-Core 252 90% 159 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 666 73% 577 Pts	64-Core 667 41% 667 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 92.2% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Lighting 70.9 Reflection 60.6 Parallax 94.2 58% 75.2 fps	MRender 59.5 Gravity 58.9 Splatting 75.6 54% 64.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 750GB-$310 3,724 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 253GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3486 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 694 (B1) Unknown 99 99 11 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 42 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 103 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17102271850	64.5% Good	Read 494 Write 334 Mixed 342 86% 390 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 18.5 77% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 23 DQ Write 21.6 DQ Mixed 9.76 11% 18.1 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5550 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1066 (B1) Unknown 98 98 22 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 42 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 107 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10836493850	70.1% Very good	Read 503 Write 396 Mixed 406 97% 435 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 28.6 4K Mixed 11 69% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 22.5 DQ Write 241 DQ Mixed 11.8 45% 91.9 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 415GB free Firmware: 1AJ1 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 95.3 Write 124 Mixed 117 85% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 2.23 4K Mixed 0.63 147% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 75%
Hitachi HDS721075KLA330 750GB-$100 3,905 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 201GB free Firmware: GK8OA90A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 130 130 152 (03) Spinup time 146 146 42974314941 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3572 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 5 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 132 132 33 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 49960 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3182 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 6018 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 6018 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 261993398307 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 4 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 38	38.2% Below average	Read 71 Write 62 Mixed 69.2 51% 67.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.47 114% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB 48,796 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	63.1% Good	MC Read 22.1 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 19.5 61% 21.3 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 20.9 59% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 57.5 70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD5H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	155x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	44x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	37x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	37x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	21x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	19x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	8x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 23,732 samples	8x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16