Lenovo 20240

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

System	Lenovo 20240 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Lenovo G505
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 20 '17 at 17:51
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5000 APU 10,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	29.6% Poor	Memory 44.1 1-Core 23.4 2-Core 46.6 25% 38 Pts	4-Core 89.1 8-Core 84.9 12% 87 Pts	64-Core 90.7 6% 90.7 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330 8,573 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 3803) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 12.102.1.1000 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.67% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 2.96 Parallax 1.31 2% 2.02 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 1.53 Splatting 2.96 2% 2.46 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.67% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 182GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 439 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 194 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 57 46 43 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2655276581	79.8% Very good	Read 496 Write 380 Mixed 409 95% 429 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 25.2 107% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 82.5 DQ Mixed 42.8 47% 79.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 124%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 750GB 156 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 155GB free, PID a207 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 79.6 Write 72 Mixed 34.1 74% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.19 54% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3170EB68F9W1600 Kingston 99U5469-041.A00LF 8GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 6.5 17% 6.07 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 5.6 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 184 22% 184 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 20240 Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 21%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20240

CPU
E1-2100 APUAMDBench 17%, 4,569 samples	33x
A4-5000 APUAMDBench 27%, 10,330 samples	26x
A6-5200 APUAMDBench 30%, 10,450 samples	15x

GPU
HD 8210AMDBench 1%, 4,832 samples	33x
Radeon HD 8330AMDBench 2%, 8,573 samples	26x
Radeon HD 8400-R3AMDBench 2%, 11,968 samples	14x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x

RAM
RMT3170EB68F9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 27%, 4,598 samples	6x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 19,285 samples	5x
RMT3170EF68F9W1600 1x4GBRamaxelBench 28%, 4,466 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $52

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16