Zoostorm 7200-9025A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemZoostorm 7200-9025A  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P65_P67SG
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime8 Days
Run DateAug 20 '17 at 15:24
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 98.5
54% 83.5 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 158
19% 145 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M
Clevo(1558 6556) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
44% Average
Lighting 54.4
Reflection 53.5
Parallax 46.9
44% 51.6 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 50
Splatting 50.5
43% 53.5 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT256G1122 256GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2320000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 84%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
871GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 96.8
Write 39.8
Mixed 58.4
49% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.41
4K Mixed 0.19
48% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.4
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 19.6
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback