| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| System | HP Z640 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212A |
| Memory | 7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150722 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 20 '17 at 12:46 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | ARE-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
|
65.9%
Good
|
57% 94.5 Pts
|
45% 368 Pts
|
36% 590 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
HP(103C 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 358.91
|
21.1%
Poor
|
20% 26.6 fps
|
24% 29.3 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
57.4%
Above average
|
60% 21 GB/s
|
38% 13.4 GB/s
|
50% 79.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z640 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,591 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z640 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 113x |
| Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 100x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 97x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 146x |
| Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 115x |
| Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 62x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 16% - Very poor | Total price: $509 |