Asus F1A75-M PRO/CSM

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-M PRO/CSM (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140527
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '17 at 17:40
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Memory 78.3 1-Core 51.6 2-Core 103 49% 77.5 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 183 26% 194 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D 4,197 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	4.83% Terrible	Lighting 6.13 Reflection 7 Parallax 6.06 5% 6.4 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 5.27 Splatting 6.04 4% 5.4 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.83% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: 600A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 9934487 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 -27341761786256 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 71 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 41 (B1) Unknown 0 0 99 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 27 34 77311639579 (C2) HDA temperature 27 34 77311639579 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 9934487 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 9934487 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 9934487 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 4294967297 (E9) Unknown 0 0 16953 (EA) Unknown 0 0 7512 (F1) Unknown 0 0 7512 (F2) Unknown 0 0 16121 (F4) Unknown 98 98 196739145	55.3% Above average	Read 439 Write 206 Mixed 239 65% 294 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 51.6 4K Mixed 12.7 68% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 129 DQ Mixed 54.5 59% 97.3 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 85%
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$35 11,469 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 463GB free Firmware: TD27 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 243536939 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11702 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 283815814 (09) Power-on hours count 54 54 40988 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 189 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BC) Unknown 100 253 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 62 471597084 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 47 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 237552 (C2) HDA temperature 28 40 77309411356 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 53 45 243536939 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	59.6% Above average	Read 103 Write 105 Mixed 95.5 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.3 85% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 58%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 244 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 426GB free, PID 0201 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 105 Write 102 Mixed 74.8 118% 93.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.19 67% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB 5,448 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.4% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 13.3 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 9 22% 7.7 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-M PRO/CSM Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M PRO/CSM

CPU
A4-3400 APUAMD $80Bench 36%, 2,796 samples	1x
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	1x
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

RAM
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	1x
RipjawsZ DDR3 1866 C9 1x4GBG.SKILLBench 37%, 15 samples	1x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus F1A75-M PRO/CSM

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M PRO/CSM

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)