Packard ENNS44HR

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Packard ENNS44HR (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard ENNS44HR
Memory	0.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110428
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '17 at 07:31
Run Duration	97 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 87.1 1-Core 71 2-Core 137 61% 98.4 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 179 24% 179 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M 5,654 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0509) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5850 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	1.88% Terrible	Lighting 2.13 Reflection 2.42 Parallax 0.88 2% 1.81 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 2.52 2% 2.68 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.88% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 14 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 45 (A5) Unknown 100 100 8591310862 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 47 35 279172874293 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 17180065796 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 65 (EA) Unknown 100 100 131 (F1) Unknown 253 253 112 (F2) Unknown 253 253 956 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	44.8% Average	Read 472 Write 176 Mixed 122 56% 257 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 26.1 4K Mixed 2.77 36% 13.7 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 46.8 DQ Mixed 0.03 31% 79.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR128X64D3S1333C9 830B NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 3GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333 MHz 1024, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.5% Average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 14 MC Mixed 12.3 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 12.9 SC Mixed 11.6 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ENNS44HR Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Packard ENNS44HR

CPU
Core i5-2410MIntel $160Bench 48%, 46,742 samples	1x
Celeron B815IntelBench 42%, 2,620 samples	1x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	1x

RAM
NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GBNanyaBench 31%, 6,518 samples	1x
EBJ10UE8BDS0-DJ-F 830B NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 3GBElpidaBench 27%, 1 sample	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $160

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Packard ENNS44HR

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Packard ENNS44HR

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)