Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 18 '17 at 20:15
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
48% Average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 41.7
2-Core 80.2
42% 64.2 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 157
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
Sapphire(174B E322) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 30.6
18% 27.3 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 30.7
21% 25.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S37240G 240GB
151GB free
Firmware: 0C3G Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 445
Write 190
Mixed 191
60% 275 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 5.09
42% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 22
DQ Write 28.4
DQ Mixed 7.75
11% 19.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 77%
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507K Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 476
Write 115
Mixed 142
53% 244 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 12
56% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 99.1
DQ Write 50.4
DQ Mixed 36.9
38% 62.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 69%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
86GB free
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 62
Write 53.7
Mixed 62.8
45% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.24
72% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.9% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 99.7
40% 99.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback