HP p6590es

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP p6590es (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI 2A9C
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100519
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '17 at 19:05
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 93.6 1-Core 78.4 2-Core 157 67% 110 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 362 39% 312 Pts	64-Core 353 22% 353 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% MSI(1462 2130) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.85% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 1.81 1% 1.31 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 2.04 1% 1.66 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.85% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: 600A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 243741994 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 33363305972534 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 100 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 30 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 45 54 85902884909 (C2) HDA temperature 45 54 85902884909 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 243741994 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 243741994 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 243741994 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 96 96 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 55682 (EA) Unknown 0 0 121626 (F1) Unknown 0 0 121626 (F2) Unknown 0 0 77515 (F4) Unknown 93 93 17236195	39.1% Below average	Read 265 Write 150 Mixed 166 43% 193 MB/s	4K Read 10.9 4K Write 44 4K Mixed 9.42 52% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 88.1 DQ Write 95.6 DQ Mixed 45 47% 76.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 85%
Seagate ST3640323AS 640GB-$134 2,758 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 276GB free Firmware: SD13 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 117080564 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 734 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 6 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 155753799 (09) Power-on hours count 26 26 65055 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 41 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 251 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 93 93 7 (BC) Unknown 100 98 38655295498 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 1166 (BE) vendor-specific 56 47 807010348 (C2) HDA temperature 44 53 60129542188 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 51 22 117080564 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	62.8% Good	Read 111 Write 108 Mixed 101 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.74 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.44 110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 66%
Seagate ST3250824AS 250GB-$148 4,794 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 46GB free Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 85 76 154087482 (03) Spinup time 99 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1501 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 84 60 276175818 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 10853 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1713 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 55 48 823787565 (C2) HDA temperature 45 52 68719476781 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 60 50 154087482 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0
Poor: 14% Great: 37%
ADATA CH11 1TB 809 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 342GB free, PID a11a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 29.6 Write 25.6 Mixed 27.4 35% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.19 18% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 4x2GB 385 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	40.9% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 12.1 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 12.5 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 60.8 66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP p6590es

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)