Toshiba NB555D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 5%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemToshiba NB555D  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA PBU01
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '17 at 16:50
Run Duration517 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD C-50
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Memory 41.7
1-Core 12.1
2-Core 17.1
19% 23.6 Pts
4-Core 22.6
8-Core 23.7
3% 23.2 Pts
64-Core 22.9
1% 22.9 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6250
Toshiba(1179 FDC0) 256MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.812.2.1000
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 0.96
Parallax 0.84
0% 0.81 fps
MRender 0.95
Gravity 0.53
Splatting 1.09
1% 0.86 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2575GSX 250GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GT00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
34% Below average
Read 58.9
Write 59.9
Mixed 56.5
44% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.05
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.12
25% 0.22 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34%
Great: 42%
Generic USB Flash Disk 16GB
15GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.28% Terrible
Read 16.9
Write 9.65
Mixed 5.87
12% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.32
4K Write 0.14
4K Mixed 0.12
14% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.28%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B2873FHS-CH9 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
5.59% Terrible
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 0.4
5% 1.8 GB/s
SC Read 0
SC Write 0
SC Mixed 0
0% 0 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.59%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback