Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics83.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99M Killer/3.1  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160803
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 18 '17 at 16:33
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 92.7
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 197
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 625
60% 496 Pts
64-Core 767
48% 767 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.66
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.5% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 118
Parallax 98.6
84% 107 fps
MRender 98.2
Gravity 97.1
Splatting 102
81% 99 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
329GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 505
Write 346
Mixed 359
89% 404 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 24.2
100% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 74.6
94% 174 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 126%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,857
Write 1,001
Mixed 1,219
300% 1,359 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 38.4
123% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 395
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 110
121% 212 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 185%
Great: 283%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
460GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 165
Write 126
Mixed 134
106% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.89
4K Mixed 0.4
154% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB-$92
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 59.1
MC Mixed 45
141% 49.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 19.3
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 124%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99M Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $591
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback