Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	68.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO (all builds)
Memory	22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170622
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '17 at 07:05
Run Duration	297 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 76.6 1-Core 113 2-Core 224 77% 138 Pts	4-Core 445 8-Core 882 78% 663 Pts	64-Core 1,236 76% 1,236 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-X-$781 8,241 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AMD(1002 0B36) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	68.8% Good	Lighting 86.7 Reflection 61.5 Parallax 120 71% 89.3 fps	MRender 61.9 Gravity 95.7 Splatting 79.6 65% 79 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 291GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	247% Outstanding	Read 2,553 Write 1,673 Mixed 1,783 444% 2,003 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 40.2 4K Mixed 31.9 107% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 93.2 102% 170 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 247% Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 92GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 23764 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 951 (B1) Unknown 95 95 243 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 53 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 275 (F1) Unknown 99 99 60367586992	83.6% Excellent	Read 524 Write 461 Mixed 485 109% 490 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 24.9 88% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 76.2 82% 138 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 124%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB 1,262 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 8TB free Firmware: 0001 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 163 Mixed 152 123% 164 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 0.34 132% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 105%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 3TB free Firmware: FS2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 10233 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 541 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 953 (0A) Spinup retry count 110 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 14 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1163 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 150325100574 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 99 99 555 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 631 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0
Poor: 58% Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 219 219 34375467292 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3820 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 17774 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 485 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4294 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4294 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 188980002850 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	88.1% Excellent	Read 173 Write 134 Mixed 134 110% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.16 72% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 183 183 34385428715 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3924 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 17763 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 483 (C0) Power-off retract count 97 97 4378 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 4378 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 193275035682 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	89.6% Excellent	Read 151 Write 161 Mixed 143 114% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.99 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 0.24 105% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 107%
hp v100w 8GB 193 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 3207 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	8.31% Terrible	Read 24.1 Write 10.6 Mixed 13.3 18% 16 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.02 40% 3.48 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.31% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2800 C14 2x16GB 195 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	MC Read 35.9 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 31.4 95% 33.2 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 33.9 SC Mixed 27 79% 27.5 GB/s	Latency 87 46% 87 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 92%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	277x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	206x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	191x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	193x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	155x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	115x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	88x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	60x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	53x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	69x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	44x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $855

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16