Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte AX370-Gaming K5
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170616
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 18 '17 at 05:39
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 69.2 1-Core 93.6 2-Core 186 65% 116 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 598 54% 454 Pts	64-Core 1,066 66% 1,066 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% XFX(1682 9460) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Lighting 26.8 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 31.8 22% 29.9 fps	MRender 30.5 Gravity 24.9 Splatting 34.2 25% 29.9 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	217% Outstanding	Read 2,436 Write 1,059 Mixed 1,290 350% 1,595 MB/s	4K Read 48.7 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 26.8 172% 65.3 MB/s	DQ Read 53.8 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 50.6 60% 99.1 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 217% Great: 236%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 112GB free Firmware: 501ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3815730 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 0 110346299772674 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1457 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 76 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 32 79 73019621408 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3815730 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3815730 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3815730 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1861 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2206 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2206 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2651	61.6% Good	Read 464 Write 116 Mixed 114 50% 231 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 71.2 4K Mixed 17.9 98% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 47.6 66% 123 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 931GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 67 67 5785705 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 11 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 14235 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 11 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 10 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 62 639696934 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 11 (C2) HDA temperature 38 21 90194313254 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 4 4 5785705 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 74165495267339 (F1) Unknown 100 253 3272790 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2512915	105% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 178 Mixed 161 132% 175 MB/s	4K Read 1.04 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.31 110% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$83 8,676 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	MC Read 37.3 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 30.3 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 24.6 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Gunboat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	82x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	77x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	54x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	45x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	42x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	41x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	22x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	16x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	13x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	18x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $450

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16