MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory123.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150320
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateAug 17 '17 at 23:12
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 647
63% 518 Pts
64-Core 806
50% 806 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.53
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 53% Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
661GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 505
Write 352
Mixed 359
90% 405 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 19.3
100% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 18.2
80% 182 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 126%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
449GB free
Firmware: 1B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 2,649
Write 1,440
Mixed 1,423
404% 1,837 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 37.5
148% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 139
145% 242 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 252%
Great: 254%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
2.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 156
Mixed 155
122% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.72
4K Write 3.02
4K Mixed 0.3
120% 1.35 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 100%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 16GB-$19
13GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
22% Poor
Read 103
Write 23.6
Mixed 44
59% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.88
4K Write 0.26
4K Mixed 0.28
36% 1.81 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 41.5
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 21.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 107%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 883 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $371
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback