User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGBT___ GBTUACPI
MotherboardGigabyte 8I945GZME-RH
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '17 at 22:30
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron E3300-$65
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Memory 42.1
1-Core 15
2-Core 33.2
21% 30.1 Pts
4-Core 33.5
8-Core 31.8
4% 32.7 Pts
64-Core 33.8
2% 33.8 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
Nvidia(10DE 069C) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
5.42% Terrible
Lighting 7.73
Reflection 4.23
Parallax 3.97
6% 5.31 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 8.33
Splatting 2.83
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.42%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1200JS-00MHB0 120GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 55.3
Write 55
Mixed 24.4
33% 44.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.12
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.04
16% 0.19 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback