Asus Maximus Extreme

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics38.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Maximus Extreme  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090324
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateAug 17 '17 at 21:06
Run Duration326 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Memory 82.8
1-Core 51.5
2-Core 103
51% 79.1 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 197
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Asus(1043 83F7) 2GB
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1512 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Lighting 47.3
Reflection 42.1
Parallax 56.1
38% 48.5 fps
MRender 53.7
Gravity 55.1
Splatting 40.3
40% 49.7 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.4% Average
Read 163
Write 231
Mixed 176
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 12.9
84% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 29
DQ Write 85.5
DQ Mixed 15.3
24% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 111%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
103GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 147
Write 139
Mixed 102
96% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.96
4K Write 2.25
4K Mixed 0.26
111% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 108%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
52GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 87.8
Write 74.5
Mixed 65.2
57% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.37
94% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 59%
Kindle Internal Storage 1GB
1GB free, PID 0004
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
5.62% Terrible
Read 9.16
Write 5.44
Mixed 5.37
8% 6.66 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.89
4K Mixed 0.71
60% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.62%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
24.6% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.8
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus Extreme Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Maximus Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $253
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback