Hp-pavilion BK119AA-ABM s5360la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion BK119AA-ABM s5360la (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI IONA
Memory	0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091221
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '17 at 19:43
Run Duration	185 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 530-$45 16,724 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	43.8% Average	Memory 65.4 1-Core 58.4 2-Core 97.2 46% 73.7 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 159 18% 142 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 51%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 879GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA7C0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 97 0 (02) Throughput performance 143 100 67 (03) Spinup time 127 100 12896764084 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 92 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 118 100 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 263 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 88 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 13986 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 56 505413664 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 101 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 101 (C2) HDA temperature 187 136 188979740704 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	79.4% Very good	Read 125 Write 152 Mixed 141 105% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.16 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.08 45% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 107%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 16GB 2,979 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 14GB free, PID 5597 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 32 Write 8.22 Mixed 11.6 18% 17.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.81 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 0.34 98% 2.09 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
FE02FE02 EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 1x2GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	22.5% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 7.4 22% 7.63 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.4 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 26%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hp-pavilion BK119AA-ABM s5360la

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)