Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120914
Uptime	8 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '17 at 14:30
Run Duration	355 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 83.2 1-Core 47.8 2-Core 89.4 49% 73.5 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 282 28% 231 Pts	64-Core 283 18% 283 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85CD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.28 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32.3% Below average	Lighting 40.6 Reflection 30.6 Parallax 37.8 33% 36.3 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 39.2 Splatting 36 31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41100RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1247 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 625 (A5) Unknown 100 100 64453869982 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3 (A7) Unknown 100 100 43 (A8) Unknown 100 100 20 (A9) Unknown 100 100 354 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 9 (AE) Unknown 100 100 87 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 62 67 287763529766 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1176839651612 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2291 (EA) Unknown 100 100 4250 (F1) Unknown 253 253 3660 (F2) Unknown 253 253 5959 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	49% Average	Read 356 Write 176 Mixed 206 54% 246 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 41 4K Mixed 11.7 78% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 26.1 DQ Write 41.8 DQ Mixed 10.8 15% 26.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 101%
SiImage 120GB 244 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 76GB free Firmware: 0000 Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 397 Write 77.7 Mixed 99.3 41% 191 MB/s	4K Read 7.37 4K Write 55.3 4K Mixed 4.52 46% 22.4 MB/s	DQ Read 4.92 DQ Write 42.3 DQ Mixed 23 18% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 65%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 401GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 71 (03) Spinup time 126 126 12896698551 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3000 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 110 110 36 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 8214 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2661 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3041 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3041 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 197569019940 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 4	99% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 176 Mixed 163 128% 169 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.21 88% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 103%
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 166GB free Firmware: 1AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 894 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 84 60 4886 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5950 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 18720 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 148 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5354 (BF) G-sense error rate 99 99 13157 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 54 197568954402 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 18 (C8) Write error rate 1 1 45698 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 148 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 6441	74.4% Very good	Read 126 Write 133 Mixed 122 96% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 2.28 4K Mixed 0.41 119% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 81%
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34 18,767 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 110GB free Firmware: 0003SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 202929579 (03) Spinup time 99 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3971 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 4 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 353173131 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12918 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3490 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 94 94 6 (BC) Unknown 100 98 13 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 49 572653602 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1526 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 24 24 152299 (C2) HDA temperature 34 51 42949672994 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 62 51 202929579 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	29.4% Poor	Read 51.1 Write 51.2 Mixed 49.8 38% 50.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.81 4K Mixed 0.25 61% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 39%
Toshiba MK6475GSX 640GB-$66 9,402 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 70GB free Firmware: GT001M Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 2096 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 5132 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 520 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 4591 (0A) Spinup retry count 202 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4318 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 209 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 303 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 12667 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 236223791140 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 63 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 120 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 497 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 91 (DE) Loaded hours 93 93 3075 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 337 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	15.1% Very poor	Read 40.8 Write 11.5 Mixed 56.7 28% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.39 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.16 54% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 45%
Samsung HD322GJ 320GB 9,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 46GB free Firmware: 1AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 83 79 5159 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2028 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 26391 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 7 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1723 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1065 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 53 201863856162 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 294 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 7 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 2326	59.2% Above average	Read 107 Write 98.6 Mixed 76.6 70% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 2.55 4K Mixed 0.4 112% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 81%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905474-060.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5471-056.A00LF 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 667, 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.5% Poor	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 10 27% 9.37 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 8.2 20% 7.03 GB/s	Latency 74.9 53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	34x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16