Hp-pavilion NM685AA-ABZ a6745it

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion NM685AA-ABZ a6745it  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON Benicia
Memory2.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081216
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateAug 17 '17 at 12:26
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 56.4
1-Core 31
2-Core 37.3
30% 41.6 Pts
4-Core 93.1
8-Core 94.1
12% 93.6 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 310
MSI(1462 1837) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.29% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 2
2% 2.08 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.29%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500620AS 500GB-$145
343GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP24 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 77.4
Write 74.7
Mixed 76.8
58% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.24
61% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 4.7
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 3.4
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback