Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive284% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory59.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 17 '17 at 10:13
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$499
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 86.9
1-Core 130
2-Core 241
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 997
88% 746 Pts
64-Core 1,582
98% 1,582 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
804GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 740
Write 819
Mixed 771
174% 777 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 27.6
112% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 118
112% 164 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 122%
Great: 541%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
516GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
284% Outstanding
Read 2,549
Write 1,697
Mixed 1,952
458% 2,066 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 38.4
230% 95.7 MB/s
DQ Read 43.2
DQ Write 459
DQ Mixed 101
123% 201 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 284%
Great: 363%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 6TB (2016)-$149
1.5TB free
Firmware: DN03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 153
Write 148
Mixed 158
116% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.57
4K Write 3.55
4K Mixed 0.3
164% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 118%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 207
Mixed 146
126% 168 MB/s
4K Read 6.57
4K Write 0.49
4K Mixed 0.36
323% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 103%
Great: 118%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 208
Write 234
Mixed 191
158% 211 MB/s
4K Read 2.69
4K Write 3.16
4K Mixed 0.31
205% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 127%
Great: 118%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
1TB free
Firmware: FS2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 129
Write 131
Mixed 147
103% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.71
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.3
143% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
885GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 154
Write 151
Mixed 129
108% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 2.14
4K Mixed 0.25
86% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
123% Outstanding
MC Read 52.2
MC Write 50.2
MC Mixed 43.6
139% 48.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 21
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 123%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $924
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback