Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '17 at 05:15
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 741
75% 606 Pts
64-Core 773
48% 773 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2039 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 71% Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 11.5TB
808GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 414
Mixed 452
101% 455 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 39.6
166% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 134
159% 276 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 111%
Great: 381%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
802GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 2,030
Write 1,477
Mixed 1,224
349% 1,577 MB/s
4K Read 54.4
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 53.3
217% 77.9 MB/s
DQ Read 559
DQ Write 417
DQ Mixed 203
229% 393 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 259%
Great: 302%
Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
204GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: Unknown
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 395
Mixed 399
95% 425 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 19.2
123% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 69.8
103% 191 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 111%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
7TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 177
Write 162
Mixed 145
203% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.78
4K Write 4.41
4K Mixed 0.62
178% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 30.7
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 42
SC Mixed 28.8
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,163
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback