Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX HERO  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 16 '17 at 02:37
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 96.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 268
93% 166 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 739
72% 588 Pts
64-Core 741
46% 741 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 384.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 23.1
Parallax 18.8
16% 20.6 fps
MRender 29.4
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 26.9
21% 25.6 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$376
846GB free
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 1,046
Write 432
Mixed 621
154% 700 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 46.3
178% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 390
DQ Mixed 143
175% 308 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 140%
Great: 246%
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 491
Write 254
Mixed 269
74% 338 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 22.7
114% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 39.7
77% 157 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 95%
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119
267GB free
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 1,168
Write 532
Mixed 736
179% 812 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 49.2
198% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 35
DQ Write 511
DQ Mixed 153
154% 233 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 152%
Great: 144%
Crucial MX200 SATA M.2 500GB-$258
238GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 526
Write 399
Mixed 412
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 33.6
151% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 34.1
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 62.2
75% 124 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 115%
Corsair Force LE 480GB-$277
198GB free
Firmware: SAFC12.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 518
Write 353
Mixed 355
90% 408 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 82.2
4K Mixed 10.3
109% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 33.6
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 9.9
43% 90.3 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 100%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
161GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 513
Write 415
Mixed 418
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 51
197% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 127
144% 247 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$201
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 38.3
MC Mixed 31.5
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 30.4
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 51.8
77% 51.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX HERO Builds (Compare 4,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,107
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback