Asrock A88M-ITX/ac R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock A88M-ITX/ac R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160408
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '17 at 23:15
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889 6,638 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Memory 79.5 1-Core 74.1 2-Core 148 60% 100 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 233 31% 230 Pts	64-Core 230 14% 230 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 25,284 User benchmarks, average bench 6% ASRock(1849 130F) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	8.97% Terrible	Lighting 11.2 Reflection 10.3 Parallax 14.8 9% 12.1 fps	MRender 9.24 Gravity 10.3 Splatting 11.5 9% 10.3 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.97% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 7056463 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 -74406013434393 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 595 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 59 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 40 55 77313015848 (C2) HDA temperature 40 55 77313015848 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 7056463 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 7056463 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 7056463 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1836 (EA) Unknown 0 0 815 (F1) Unknown 0 0 815 (F2) Unknown 0 0 793 (F4) Unknown 100 100 1441800	59.7% Above average	Read 451 Write 113 Mixed 153 52% 239 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 90 4K Mixed 14.6 106% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 74.5 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 28.5 40% 73.1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 75%
Toshiba MQ01ABU050W 500GB 121 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 117GB free Firmware: FN0A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1322 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1445 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 1798 (0A) Spinup retry count 128 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1115 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 3 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3080276 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 22812 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 231929479205 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 99 99 401 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 169 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	45.5% Average	Read 78.2 Write 80.1 Mixed 74.1 58% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.18 66% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GB 9,036 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2132 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.3% Average	MC Read 20.6 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 19.5 47% 16.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 6.7 SC Mixed 13.3 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 81.6 49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88M-ITX/ac R2.0 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

Motherboard: Asrock A88M-ITX/ac R2.0

CPU
A8-5500 APUAMD $135Bench 48%, 10,478 samples	1x
Athlon X4 845AMD $50Bench 45%, 6,391 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x
Radeon R9 280XAMDBench 27%, 21 samples	1x

RAM
Value DDR3 1600 C11 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 50%, 2,053 samples	1x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $414

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock A88M-ITX/ac R2.0

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock A88M-ITX/ac R2.0

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)