ADD TO PC
BUILD

Compulab sbc-flt1

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Compulab sbc-flt1 (all builds)
Motherboard	CompuLab fitlet
Memory	2 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20151130
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '17 at 17:02
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4 Micro-6400T APU + Radeon R3 Graphics 101 User benchmarks, average bench 26% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Memory 41.1 1-Core 19.1 2-Core 32.8 22% 31 Pts	4-Core 37.1 8-Core 41.7 5% 39.4 Pts	64-Core 45.1 3% 45.1 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics 101 User benchmarks, average bench 1% AMD(1002 0123) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2401.1002 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.57% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 1.35 Parallax 0.47 0% 0.74 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.52 1% 1.26 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.57% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SFAT064G1122 64GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2201000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 141 100 141 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 961 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 52 (A9) Unknown 100 100 89 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 39 (AE) Unknown 100 100 464 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 63 100 249108103205 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1290 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1006 (F2) Unknown 253 253 1707	38.4% Below average	Read 472 Write 89.3 Mixed 145 51% 236 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 24.9 4K Mixed 2.98 43% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 59.7 DQ Write 41.1 DQ Mixed 22.6 24% 41.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 55%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB 23,482 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 16GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	9.64% Terrible	Read 20.2 Write 7.56 Mixed 10.9 14% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.08 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 1.03 95% 1.84 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.64% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 1x4GB 14,353 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.4% Very poor	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 3.6 9% 3.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback