| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 0.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Samsung R510/P510 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG R510/P510 |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit farver |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100401 |
| Uptime | 0.7 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 14 '17 at 09:04 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | DNK-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
39.9%
Below average
|
36% 51.1 Pts
|
8% 57.3 Pts
|
3% 55.4 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 9200M GS
Sanyo(144D C042) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1
|
0.58%
Terrible
|
0% 0.64 fps
|
1% 0.98 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
42.7%
Average
|
53% 238 MB/s
|
58% 20.2 MB/s
|
28% 39.1 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
13% 4.43 GB/s
|
13% 4.5 GB/s
|
40% 100 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical R510/P510 Builds (Compare 9 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung R510/P510
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples | 2x |
| Core2 Duo T5750Intel $99Bench 32%, 2,050 samples | 2x |
| Core2 Duo P8400Intel $20Bench 37%, 6,904 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 9200M GSNvidiaBench 1%, 1,057 samples | 6x |
| Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $42 |