Lenovo 20EGS28V00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20EGS28V00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EGS28V00
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '17 at 06:14
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Memory 58.2
1-Core 23.9
2-Core 47.3
30% 43.1 Pts
4-Core 81.9
8-Core 121
13% 101 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1100M
Legend(17AA 2211) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.1254
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
5.26% Terrible
Lighting 5.23
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 5.91
4% 5.51 fps
MRender 8.71
Gravity 8.6
Splatting 8.91
7% 8.74 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.26%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HCHP-000 256GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 403
Write 116
Mixed 149
48% 223 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 29.1
4K Mixed 16
61% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 98.1
DQ Mixed 55.3
56% 91.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.6
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback