Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+-$50 2,970 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	28.2% Poor	Memory 47.8 1-Core 32.6 2-Core 63.1 30% 47.8 Pts	4-Core 50.3 8-Core 59.9 7% 55.1 Pts	64-Core 66.4 4% 66.4 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% PNY(196E 0F02) 2GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.47% Terrible	Lighting 2.47 Reflection 4.73 Parallax 1.44 2% 2.88 fps	MRender 4.71 Gravity 4.57 Splatting 3.39 3% 4.22 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.47% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB 14,293 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	25.6% Poor	Read 111 Write 42 Mixed 62.4 16% 71.9 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 10.6 57% 20.1 MB/s	DQ Read 24.9 DQ Write 51.6 DQ Mixed 9.22 15% 28.6 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 51%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 32GB free Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 73.7 Write 70 Mixed 80.1 56% 74.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.11 4K Write 2.28 4K Mixed 0.27 118% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 2 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16