Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results


Gaming 107% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 106% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 7680 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170710
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '17 at 22:53
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	78.7% Very good	Memory 88.8 1-Core 104 2-Core 196 76% 130 Pts	4-Core 369 8-Core 688 63% 528 Pts	64-Core 1,255 78% 1,255 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6390) CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 3025 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	131% Outstanding	Lighting 182 Reflection 207 Parallax 210 148% 200 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 179 Splatting 126 118% 146 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$139 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 870GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1452 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 463 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 51 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 232 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2270030985	104% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 397 Mixed 413 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 42.7 4K Write 84.4 4K Mixed 42.7 164% 56.6 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 26.3 70% 148 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 133%
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69 12,601 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 299GB free Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	196% Outstanding	Read 1,452 Write 1,266 Mixed 1,344 302% 1,354 MB/s	4K Read 43.8 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 42.3 177% 64.2 MB/s	DQ Read 46.6 DQ Write 271 DQ Mixed 32.5 62% 117 MB/s
Poor: 136% ↑ This bench: 196% Great: 262%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 211GB free Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 2076 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 649 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 50 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 91 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3006443166	88.9% Excellent	Read 496 Write 404 Mixed 411 97% 437 MB/s	4K Read 42 4K Write 82.6 4K Mixed 26 141% 50.2 MB/s	DQ Read 43.3 DQ Write 90 DQ Mixed 25.9 31% 53 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 131%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 140GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3894 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 849 (B1) Unknown 99 99 10 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 50 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 358 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7622463578	96.6% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 416 Mixed 414 99% 447 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 81.1 4K Mixed 25.3 138% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 25.4 75% 162 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 655GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 171 2266 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 938 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 3896 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 677 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 302 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 4000 (C2) HDA temperature 109 92 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	110% Outstanding	Read 207 Write 178 Mixed 160 136% 182 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.29 109% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 109%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 7TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 191 Write 171 Mixed 172 226% 178 MB/s	4K Read 1.42 4K Write 4.48 4K Mixed 0.61 178% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3466 MHz clocked @ 1733 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	MC Read 46.9 MC Write 44.2 MC Mixed 39.6 124% 43.6 GB/s	SC Read 26.6 SC Write 40.1 SC Mixed 31.1 93% 32.6 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 629 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 88%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	120x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	87x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	73x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	44x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	22x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	38x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $1,060

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16