Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5355 426 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	39.7% Below average	Memory 56.8 1-Core 30.7 2-Core 61.3 33% 49.6 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 246 22% 184 Pts	64-Core 246 15% 246 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 580 5,936 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Nvidia(10DE 063A) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.9038 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.7% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 3.73 Parallax 0.69 2% 2.14 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 1.43 Splatting 2.26 2% 2.28 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.7% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI MegaRAID 8704ELP 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 209% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.12 Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	225% Outstanding	Read 370 Write 415 Mixed 268 261% 351 MB/s	4K Read 1.27 4K Write 0.44 4K Mixed 0.65 134% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 225% Great: 247%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x4GB 5,222 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 8 of 8 slots used 32GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	13.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 4.5 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 4.4 10% 3.4 GB/s	Latency 137 29% 137 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 148%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon L54201stBench 45%, 65 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon 3.73GHz1stBench 33%, 70 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	1x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	1x

SSD
AS350 120GBApacerBench 61%, 2,135 samples	1x
SDEZS25-240G-Z01 240GBBench 43%, 706 samples	1x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	1x
8x4GBUnknownBench 90%, 5,222 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16