Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	21% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170620
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '17 at 21:06
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 72 1-Core 109 2-Core 206 72% 129 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 671 61% 514 Pts	64-Core 915 57% 915 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Sapphire(174B E218) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	21% Poor	Lighting 25.5 Reflection 27.5 Parallax 30 21% 27.7 fps	MRender 23.2 Gravity 20.1 Splatting 32.1 21% 25.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 240GB 8,481 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 167GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM22.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1952 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 518 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2 (AA) Unknown 100 100 510 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1245246 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 146 (C2) HDA temperature 98 98 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 1 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4038	75.7% Very good	Read 520 Write 462 Mixed 481 109% 488 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 60.1 4K Mixed 11.6 86% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 25.6 DQ Write 63.8 DQ Mixed 11.6 18% 33.7 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 102%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 66 (03) Spinup time 151 151 25793921415 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 245 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 455 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 109 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 245 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 245 (C2) HDA temperature 181 181 171800133665 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	89.8% Excellent	Read 163 Write 150 Mixed 157 118% 157 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 0.22 91% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 108%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68 105,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 395GB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 104772800 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1997 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 130183139 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4486 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1524 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 1 42950329373 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 54 555745312 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 207 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6846 (C2) HDA temperature 32 46 47244640288 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 1615 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -78413217917528 (F1) Unknown 100 253 35564238162 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1174005697867
Poor: 48% Great: 112%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 0GB free Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 85 242016270 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 8011 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 89 60 877466499 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 21876 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 6091 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 45 589430819 (C2) HDA temperature 35 55 60129542179 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 94 60 208480072 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 3 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 3 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 194 583 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	22.6% Poor	Read 56.4 Write 22.5 Mixed 74.4 40% 51.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.22 49% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 54%
Adata DashDrive Elite S102 Pro USB 3.0 32GB-$11 1,777 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 28GB free, PID 312b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Read 82.4 Write 28.9 Mixed 34.8 52% 48.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.23 4K Write 0.23 4K Mixed 0.29 37% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81% Excellent	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 27.6 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 23.2 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 96.7 41% 96.7 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)