HP Compaq 2core Pentium

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 2core Pentium (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK 2A73h
Memory	4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090223
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '17 at 19:59
Run Duration	772 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	70%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E4600 6,872 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Memory 33.1 1-Core 15.7 2-Core 38.3 19% 29 Pts	4-Core 34.7 8-Core 42.2 5% 38.5 Pts	64-Core 44.3 3% 44.3 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 359GB free Firmware: 3.AAK Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 88 184177174 (03) Spinup time 96 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 560 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 80 60 111803041 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 2218 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 285 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 56 46 740491308 (C2) HDA temperature 44 54 77309411372 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 59 55 182310315 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	31.4% Below average	Read 52 Write 57.4 Mixed 25.3 33% 44.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.2 58% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 43%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 417GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.CHN Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 98 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1174 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 85 60 401422606 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4953 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1172 (B8) Unknown 100 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 79 79 21 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 54 50 841678894 (C2) HDA temperature 46 50 68719476782 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 65 60 96950571 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	36.7% Below average	Read 61.6 Write 66 Mixed 58.5 47% 62 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.25 65% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 43%
SAMSUNG m3 portable 3.0 640GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 596GB free, PID 6031 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.06% Terrible	Read 22.1 Write 1.03 Mixed 4.1 8% 9.09 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.18 4K Mixed 0.18 13% 0.22 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.06% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 1024, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	9.66% Terrible	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3 9% 3.23 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 2.4 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 237 17% 237 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.66% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP Compaq 2core Pentium

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)