| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 44.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-PLUS D3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160526 |
| Uptime | 1.2 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 13 '17 at 17:59 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.9%
Good
|
65% 113 Pts
|
47% 351 Pts
|
21% 339 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Asus(1043 8495) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44.6%
Average
|
44% 55 fps
|
45% 57.1 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.7%
Above average
|
53% 18.6 GB/s
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
44% 90.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-PLUS D3 Builds (Compare 41 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-PLUS D3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 11x |
| Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples | 9x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 6x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $166 |