Lenovo 1450A5U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 17%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.49%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 8 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 1450A5U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Inagua
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '17 at 16:25
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD E-350
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
9.49% Terrible
SC Int 26.1
SC Float 19.2
SC Mixed 20.2
18% 21.8 Pts
QC Int 44.6
QC Float 31
QC Mixed 37.3
9% 37.6 Pts
MC Int 55.4
MC Float 37.5
MC Mixed 43.9
7% 45.6 Pts
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.49%
Great: 12%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310M
Legend(17AA 397B) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.822.4.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 4.1
1% 3.63 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.2
1% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$35
88GB free
Firmware: 02.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 57.8
Write 48.9
Mixed 56.6
41% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 0.97
4K Mixed 0.11
43% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 524D54313935304D 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.53 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 1450A5U Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%

System: Lenovo 1450A5U

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $172Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $280Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $139
Intel Core i7-7700K $285AMD RX 480 $300Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $180SanDisk Extreme 64GB $41
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $961SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback