Samsung 700G7C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemSamsung 700G7C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 13 '17 at 15:51
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$219
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
55.6% Above average
SC Int 82
SC Float 79.3
SC Mixed 85.3
66% 82.2 Pts
QC Int 262
QC Float 273
QC Mixed 263
60% 266 Pts
MC Int 396
MC Float 378
MC Mixed 386
58% 387 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 675M
Sanyo(144D C0D0) 2GB
CLim: 620 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (43 fps cap detected)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 45.2
Reflection 45.8
Parallax 42.9
14% 44.6 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 46.2
Splatting 36.7
18% 41.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 19%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 500GB-$59
463GB free
Firmware: JF3OA0D0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 93
Write 92.9
Mixed 97.2
71% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.2
71% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 62%
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 500GB-$59
315GB free
Firmware: JF3OA0D0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 7200 RPM 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 88.2
Write 77.3
Mixed 84.3
63% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 0.85
4K Mixed 0.15
47% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 62%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.28% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 4.63
Mixed 9.61
12% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.96
4K Write 0.44
4K Mixed 0.91
60% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.28%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 17.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 16.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 57%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 700G7C Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: Samsung 700G7C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $579
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $96
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $126
Intel Core i5-7600K $220Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $163SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $842SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $180SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback