Asus P8H61-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110816
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '17 at 15:27
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-2300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60.1% Good
SC Int 80.9
SC Float 82.2
SC Mixed 82.2
65% 81.8 Pts
QC Int 316
QC Float 315
QC Mixed 313
71% 315 Pts
MC Int 315
MC Float 315
MC Mixed 314
47% 315 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Asus(1043 83B5) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (50 fps cap detected)
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 51.8
Reflection 52.5
Parallax 49.3
16% 51.2 fps
MRender 49.4
Gravity 52.4
Splatting 46.5
21% 49.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 21%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 500GB-$160
252GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port
44.8% Average
Read 224
Write 217
Mixed 220
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 13.6
68% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 26.3
DQ Write 77.8
DQ Mixed 13.4
21% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 106%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
93GB free
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port
37.1% Below average
Read 225
Write 172
Mixed 197
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 4.63
54% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 22.2
DQ Write 89.4
DQ Mixed 4.41
18% 38.7 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 67%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 129
Write 111
Mixed 57.6
73% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 2.25
4K Mixed 0.27
108% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$35
15GB free
Firmware: 100. Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
NCQ 5400 RPM !4KALIGNED
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 36.7
Write 50.3
Mixed 44.8
33% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.19
64% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
894GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 25.6
Mixed 28.5
36% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.19
58% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8H61-M Builds (Compare 199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $410
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $300Nvidia GTX 1070 $390Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $96
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $280AMD RX 480 $491Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $126
Intel Core i5-7600K $220Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $159
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $163SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $842SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $180SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback