Asus P8H61-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110816
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '17 at 15:13
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 163
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 315
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Asus(1043 83B5) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 17.1
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 15.3
14% 17.5 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 17.5
Splatting 20.2
17% 20.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
252GB free
Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.4% Average
Read 224
Write 217
Mixed 220
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 36.2
4K Mixed 15.1
70% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 21
DQ Write 37.7
DQ Mixed 13.3
15% 24 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 108%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.8% Below average
Read 225
Write 174
Mixed 196
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 3.78
53% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 20.1
DQ Write 41.9
DQ Mixed 4.36
11% 22.1 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 72%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 109
Write 123
Mixed 111
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.35
4K Mixed 0.2
102% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$80
15GB free
Firmware: 100. Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 36.6
Write 50.7
Mixed 48.5
34% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.19
67% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 41%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
894GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 25.6
Mixed 13.6
28% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.19
58% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.6% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M - $77

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $355
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback