Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	14.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170620
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '17 at 14:17
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 74 1-Core 114 2-Core 201 73% 130 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 644 58% 489 Pts	64-Core 868 54% 868 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Sapphire(174B E218) 2GB CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	Lighting 25.5 Reflection 27.5 Parallax 29.7 21% 27.6 fps	MRender 23 Gravity 20 Splatting 32 21% 25 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 240GB 8,481 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM22.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1947 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 510 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2 (AA) Unknown 100 100 510 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1245245 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 142 (C2) HDA temperature 98 98 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 1 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3966	85.6% Excellent	Read 514 Write 459 Mixed 488 109% 487 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 79.6 4K Mixed 11.1 93% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 11.1 70% 161 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 102%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1TB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 66 (03) Spinup time 157 157 34383331696 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 240 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 450 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 105 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 240 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 240 (C2) HDA temperature 193 193 171800133663 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	87.1% Excellent	Read 153 Write 151 Mixed 156 116% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.24 87% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 108%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68 105,708 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 395GB free Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 99 25564352 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1992 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 130053518 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4481 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1516 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 1 42950329373 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 54 505217054 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 205 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 6829 (C2) HDA temperature 30 46 47244640286 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 1615 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -83197811485283 (F1) Unknown 100 253 35560725314 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1173817996969
Poor: 48% Great: 112%
Seagate ST3250410AS 250GB-$95 20,246 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 0GB free Firmware: 3.AAC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 85 166677211 (03) Spinup time 98 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 8006 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 89 60 877390826 (09) Power-on hours count 76 76 21871 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 6087 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 45 555679777 (C2) HDA temperature 33 55 60129542177 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 87 60 125697288 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 3 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 3 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 194 583 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	40.7% Average	Read 90.6 Write 51.2 Mixed 35.5 44% 59.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.22 51% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38 163,634 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (86^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	97.4% Outstanding	MC Read 40.9 MC Write 34.8 MC Mixed 32.6 103% 36.1 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 34.2 SC Mixed 25.4 77% 26.9 GB/s	Latency 92.4 43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)