Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170606
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '17 at 11:49
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Memory 79.3 1-Core 121 2-Core 242 81% 147 Pts	4-Core 482 8-Core 958 85% 720 Pts	64-Core 1,327 82% 1,327 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9480) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	Lighting 75.5 Reflection 70.7 Parallax 87.8 62% 78 fps	MRender 68.7 Gravity 70.5 Splatting 57.4 53% 65.5 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	228% Outstanding	Read 2,295 Write 1,368 Mixed 1,204 357% 1,622 MB/s	4K Read 52.1 4K Write 98.1 4K Mixed 26.2 164% 58.8 MB/s	DQ Read 50.3 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 25 47% 88.7 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 228% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 93GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3754 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 700 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 47 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 117 (F1) Unknown 99 99 5196176396	110% Outstanding	Read 517 Write 415 Mixed 425 101% 453 MB/s	4K Read 43 4K Write 90.2 4K Mixed 43.4 168% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 306 DQ Write 261 DQ Mixed 25.1 89% 197 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 78GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12115 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2643 (B1) Unknown 97 97 36 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 45 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 511 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17851974301	81.1% Excellent	Read 510 Write 348 Mixed 357 90% 405 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 70.2 4K Mixed 20.1 127% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 41 DQ Write 68.9 DQ Mixed 19.7 25% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 118%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 73GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 15072 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1767 (B1) Unknown 93 93 84 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 48 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 5 (EB) Unknown 99 99 769 (F1) Unknown 99 99 37861917798	80.4% Excellent	Read 507 Write 348 Mixed 350 89% 402 MB/s	4K Read 40.2 4K Write 64.2 4K Mixed 21.8 123% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 40.2 DQ Write 91.8 DQ Mixed 17.9 27% 50 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 134GB free Firmware: CC96 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 97 150690904 (03) Spinup time 91 90 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5282 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 69 60 73141672605 (09) Power-on hours count 19 12 71182 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2696 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 1194 (BC) Unknown 100 97 4295032839 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 37 8268484640805 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 459 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 325549 (C2) HDA temperature 37 63 55834574885 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 28 12 150690904 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -125971390780854 (F1) Unknown 100 253 1561539812 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3653786828	47.7% Average	Read 79 Write 87.7 Mixed 80.9 62% 82.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 0.34 4K Mixed 0.24 48% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 92,468 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2800 MHz clocked @ 1400 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	MC Read 36.9 MC Write 35.4 MC Mixed 31.9 99% 34.7 GB/s	SC Read 23 SC Write 36 SC Mixed 27 82% 28.7 GB/s	Latency 81.8 49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $86Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $749

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)