bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
System
MotherboardIntel DH61WW
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '17 at 08:25
Run Duration92 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-3330
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
63.2% Good
SC Int 82.4
SC Float 84.1
SC Mixed 87.2
68% 84.6 Pts
QC Int 297
QC Float 331
QC Mixed 329
72% 319 Pts
MC Int 327
MC Float 326
MC Mixed 322
49% 325 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Zotac(19DA 7222) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 6
Parallax 0.8
1% 3.47 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.7
2% 3.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$50
691GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 101
Write 141
Mixed 90.7
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 2.27
4K Mixed 0.29
104% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 Hynix DMT351E6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.7
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical bin Builds (Compare 14,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $701
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $325Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $300AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $117
Intel Core i5-7600K $225Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $718SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $57HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $140SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $13
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback