Supermicro Super Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Supermicro Super Server (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X11SSH-LN4F
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170309
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 13 '17 at 05:14
Run Duration	633 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 1,202 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	75.3% Very good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 106 2-Core 216 75% 133 Pts	4-Core 419 8-Core 400 55% 410 Pts	64-Core 421 26% 421 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVPV128HDGM-00000 128GB 2,105 User benchmarks, average bench 180% 96GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW7300Q Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	159% Outstanding	Read 1,385 Write 641 Mixed 881 213% 969 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 44.9 162% 59.7 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 258 DQ Mixed 20.7 95% 217 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 214%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0A82 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Read 198 Write 136 Mixed 140 118% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.88 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.25 107% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDN724040AL 4TB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3TB free Firmware: A5E0 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 161 Mixed 156 123% 163 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.22 93% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 95%
Hitachi HDN724040AL 4TB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 3TB free Firmware: A5E0 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Read 153 Write 135 Mixed 155 112% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1.13 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.21 105% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3TB free Firmware: SC48 Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 134 Write 127 Mixed 107 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 7.73 4K Mixed 0.62 245% 3.05 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 113%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0A82 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Read 191 Write 108 Mixed 117 104% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 0.29 104% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: SC48 Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Read 134 Write 118 Mixed 134 97% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2.17 4K Mixed 0.21 98% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 113%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: 0A82 Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 147 Write 82.2 Mixed 132 91% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.2 67% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDN724040AL 4TB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2TB free Firmware: A5E0 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Read 135 Write 133 Mixed 118 96% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.22 87% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 95%
Hitachi HDN724040AL 4TB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2TB free Firmware: A5E0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Read 128 Write 140 Mixed 162 109% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.2 87% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 95%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2TB free Firmware: 0A82 Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Read 185 Write 106 Mixed 109 100% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 0.64 4K Mixed 0.12 52% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 99%
Hitachi HDN724040AL 4TB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1.5TB free Firmware: A5E0 Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 118 Write 138 Mixed 123 95% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.17 81% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 95%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0A82 Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 145 Write 117 Mixed 106 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.28 107% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0A82 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Read 214 Write 117 Mixed 128 114% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.09 4K Mixed 0.22 84% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 88%
Hitachi HDN724040AL 4TB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1TB free Firmware: A5E0 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 103 Write 128 Mixed 110 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.18 80% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 95%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 911GB free Firmware: 0A82 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Read 184 Write 137 Mixed 146 117% 155 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 2.07 4K Mixed 0.18 78% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 99%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 540GB free Firmware: 0A82 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	81% Excellent	Read 155 Write 128 Mixed 92.6 93% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.17 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDN724040AL 4TB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 531GB free Firmware: A5E0 Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 131 Write 108 Mixed 98 84% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.86 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.21 97% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 95%
Hitachi HDN724040AL 4TB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 346GB free Firmware: A5E0 Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 116 Write 118 Mixed 128 91% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.18 70% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 95%
Hitachi HDN724040AL 4TB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 318GB free Firmware: A5E0 Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	55% Above average	Read 91 Write 101 Mixed 110 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.17 73% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 95%
Hitachi HDN724040AL 4TB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 299GB free Firmware: A5E0 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 135 Write 122 Mixed 134 98% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.18 75% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 95%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 8GB free Firmware: 0A82 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Read 157 Write 138 Mixed 108 100% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.29 97% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391A2K43BB1-CRC 1x16GB 208 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.5% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12.6 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 11.2 27% 9.5 GB/s	Latency 83 48% 83 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Super Server Builds (Compare 721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

System: Supermicro Super Server

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	25x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples	19x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	17x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	22x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	22x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	20x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $168Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	20x
860 Pro 512GBSamsung $150Bench 110%, 16,934 samples	18x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	13x

RAM
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	12x
18ADF2G72AZ-2G3B1 2x16GBMicronBench 76%, 43 samples	10x
36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 4x16GBMicronBench 92%, 577 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 109% - Outstanding

Total price: $622

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16