| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 0.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| System | Toshiba Satellite C655D (all builds) |
| Motherboard | TOSHIBA Portable PC |
| Memory | 1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20111220 |
| Uptime | 30.8 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 13 '17 at 01:27 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 59% |
PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD E-350
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
|
26%
Poor
|
23% 30.9 Pts
|
4% 30.8 Pts
|
2% 37 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 6310
Toshiba(1179 FDE8) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.812.2.1000
|
0.37%
Terrible
|
0% 0.66 fps
|
1% 0.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GT00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
41.8%
Average
|
53% 70.9 MB/s
|
70% 0.71 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B2873FHS-CH9 M471B5773DH0-CH9 3GB
1066, 1066 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
10.1%
Very poor
|
9% 3.23 GB/s
|
6% 2.17 GB/s
|
23% 171 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Satellite C655D Builds (Compare 35 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Toshiba Satellite C655D
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples | 10x |
| C-50AMDBench 21%, 1,781 samples | 8x |
| Athlon II P340AMD $50Bench 35%, 2,473 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples | 17x |
| Radeon HD 6250AMDBench 1%, 1,583 samples | 8x |
| Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 28% - Poor | Total price: $134 |