Asrock X99E-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99E-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160809
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 13 '17 at 01:04
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 77.4
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 244
73% 136 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 788
78% 638 Pts
64-Core 996
62% 996 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 3762) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 196
Parallax 170
146% 182 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 188
Splatting 134
124% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 1TB
472GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 396
Mixed 404
96% 433 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 40.7
128% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 128
140% 238 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 133%
WL4000GSA6472B 4TB
680GB free
Firmware: 07.01E.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 137
Write 113
Mixed 80.3
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.27
4K Mixed 0.06
16% 0.14 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 96%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$130
494GB free
Firmware: AR17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
WD i HTS54 External 80GB
8GB free, PID 0702
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.2% Very poor
Read 41
Write 39
Mixed 7.73
34% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.55
4K Mixed 0.2
27% 0.35 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.2% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 22.1
MC Mixed 21.2
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.6
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 85.5
47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99E-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99E-ITX/ac - $371

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $1,569
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback