Mousecomputer WN1001

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive13.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMousecomputer WN1001  (all builds)
MotherboardMouseComputer WN1001
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151112
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 13 '17 at 00:59
Run Duration70 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
22.7% Poor
Memory 38.9
1-Core 15.7
2-Core 29.3
20% 28 Pts
4-Core 38.3
8-Core 49.5
6% 43.9 Pts
64-Core 49.5
3% 49.5 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 30%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba 064G70 63GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.0
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 143
Write 75.4
Mixed 88.5
22% 102 MB/s
4K Read 3.97
4K Write 0.83
4K Mixed 2.47
10% 2.42 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HYNIX 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 4.7
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 1.8
8% 2.67 GB/s
Latency 208
19% 208 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback