Asus P8P67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateAug 12 '17 at 22:40
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 84.4
2-Core 167
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 312
43% 319 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Lighting 44
Reflection 39.1
Parallax 51.8
36% 45 fps
MRender 54.5
Gravity 49.7
Splatting 36.7
37% 47 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 507
Write 404
Mixed 411
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 31.8
90% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 67.1
74% 126 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 115%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB
216GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 137
Write 103
Mixed 124
92% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.37
104% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 72%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
62GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
54% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 93.7
Mixed 84.7
68% 90.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.51
126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $573
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback