Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '17 at 21:09
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User AZE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$250
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Memory 95
1-Core 143
2-Core 287
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 798
83% 666 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 40.3
29% 36.1 fps
MRender 42.9
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 36.4
32% 40.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,920
Write 1,118
Mixed 1,144
307% 1,394 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 37.5
160% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 620
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 155
181% 324 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 212%
Great: 236%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
121GB free
Firmware: 583ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 490
Write 192
Mixed 230
66% 304 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 15.5
102% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 47.1
68% 123 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
932GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 142
Mixed 161
130% 173 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 2.54
4K Mixed 0.73
169% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 103%
Great: 65%
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
932GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 157
Mixed 143
123% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.94
4K Mixed 0.8
180% 1.54 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 65%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
527GB free
Firmware: 9300
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 94.2
Write 73.2
Mixed 57.7
56% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 4.72
4K Mixed 0.34
144% 1.84 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 66%
SPCCN PHD 500GB
35GB free, PID 1d40
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 31.5
Mixed 33.1
43% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.29
58% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$560
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 27.9
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 41.6
SC Mixed 29.5
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 802 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $918
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback