Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair IV Formula (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121009
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 12 '17 at 09:10
Run Duration	248 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 73.7 2-Core 140 60% 98.4 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 378 41% 325 Pts	64-Core 372 23% 372 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Lighting 65.7 Reflection 65 Parallax 83.1 54% 71.2 fps	MRender 67.9 Gravity 64.1 Splatting 55.4 50% 62.5 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000DX001-1NS1 2TB 1TB free Firmware: CC41 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	13.1% Very poor	Read 95.4 Write 131 Mixed 104 25% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 5.44 4K Mixed 0.63 4% 2.2 MB/s

Crucial BX100 250GB-$141 42,930 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 463 Write 353 Mixed 402 90% 406 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 19.8 88% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 28.7 DQ Write 79.1 DQ Mixed 19.4 25% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 103%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 5,513 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2TB free Firmware: 9300 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 96.9 Write 90.2 Mixed 65.7 63% 84.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.08 4K Write 6.25 4K Mixed 0.55 222% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 65%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0637 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	66.4% Good	Read 117 Write 114 Mixed 107 85% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.29 90% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 67%
SAMSUNG HD105SI 1TB 122 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 239GB free, PID 0475 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 27.8 Write 26.2 Mixed 27.1 35% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.36 83% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 24%
WD Elements 10B8 1.5TB 2,049 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 56GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	22.5% Poor	Read 49.3 Write 46.5 Mixed 39.5 57% 45.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.2 65% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-447.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 9905403-447.A00LF KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.7% Average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 15.5 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 12.4 28% 9.67 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	120x
Phenom II X6 1100TAMD $340Bench 59%, 12,769 samples	34x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	10x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
INTENSO 240GBBench 77%, 887 samples	8x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	8x
F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH F3-16000CL9-2GBRH 8GBUnknownBench 39%, 26 samples	5x
F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBRL 8GBUnknownBench 44%, 282 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $520

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16